In a message dated 7/8/2004 6:17:32 PM ***@psu.edu writes:
<< It is a RP-200, but my wife and I are skeptical about it. It looks very
nice, but we can't actually hear the real thing since it's on the web. I
checked out the GeneralMusic RealPiano Pro 2 sounds at the link that you
mentioned and it sounded OK. The problem is this...these sounds are very
dependent on how the person did the recording! Did you have personal
experience with the RP200? >>
=========================
Yes -- I bought one for a former church of mine after a lot of direct
experience as a "hired gun" salesman for numerous major event sales with
various Baldwin dealers around the east -- always thought it was an
exceptionally nice unit. I played it every week for a year and a half, and I
still play it occasionally as a guest musician -- probably again in two weeks.
The rest of the sounds are decent enough (I liked Kurzweil orchestral sounds
better than the Pianovelle orchestral sounds) but the Pianovelle/GeneralMusic
Piano Pro piano voice is the best that I could find in that category about 3
or 4 years ago. I'm not up to speed on everything else currently, but I did
pound on a few Yamahas recently (Motif, S90, P80 & P90), and as far as I'm
concerned, there has been no major breakthrough for additional realism on the
piano sound from what I remember getting out of the Pianovelle RP-200.
=========================
<< The specs look nice (128 polyphony) but I'm not sure if weighted hammer
action with escapement (being that this is an older model) is equivalent to
the newer progressive hammer action keys. Are they the same? >>
=========================
"Progressive Hammer Action Keys" and "Weighted Hammer Action" are mostly
marketing terms. The Pianovelle uses a similar gram weight to overcome key
inertia as what you would ordinarily expect to find on a properly regulated
grand piano of an average or medium feel. The simulation of the escapement
helps to make it feel more like a "real" grand action once inertia is overcome
by inserting that slight "hitch" or additional resistance as the key travels
downward, but nobody makes one on a digital piano that feels exactly like the
real thing other than the few companies that do happen to use the real thing
without any hammers actually hitting physical strings. The Pianovelle RP200 is
as good as anybody elses digital piano available regardless of the marketing
name that they may use to describe it.
=========================
<< As far as the speakers, it's suppose to have a six speaker system and 2
70watt amps. Does it still sound bad? That's not good engineering if so.
Besides, I'm not worried about the sound...I can always shut off or change
the built-in speakers as you mentioned. >>
=========================
The speakers inside do not do justice to the quality of sound that it is
capable of generating. If you play it through good headphones or a high
quality speaker system, you will discover just how good the piano sound really
is.
=========================
<< It's going for about $1700, is that good? >>
=========================
That's lower than the original wholesale cost by a few hundred dollars. It's
only a good price to you if it does what you want it to do as well as or better
than whatever else you can find comparably at that price point. From what I
know of the market (not that much as of the past couple years) I'd say that
it's probably a good buy. But it's not my money, so you're the one that needs
to make that assessment.
=========================
<< Also, would you trust to order
one of these from a web vendor? >>
=========================
Depends on who the web vendor is and whether or not I had confidence in them.
I would probably rather get one from somewhere that I could see it and
likewise, in case of a problem, where I could have it serviced. But again, the
real question is, what is your comfort level with online vendors?
Good luck, Richard.
--
With All Due Respect,
Dave Andrews
D. W. Andrews Associates
Church Music System Specialists
"Two Hacks Working Out Of A Garage"
Disclaimer: If there are two ways to take my words,
always assume I was after the cheap laugh.